The present
is born out of the past and dictates the future. To understand the causes of
poverty in Africa, we must therefore first delve into the past of the
continent; and through that analysis, today’s calamity can best be understood
and only then can the right path be chartered for the future which will enable
poor and marginalized people in Africa to live without want.
The main agents of poverty in Africa are to be traced partly from the centuries before
the coming of Europeans up to the 15th century but mainly right
through the pre-colonial epoch, the Continental Slave Trade era, the colonial
time, the independence period and up to the present days.
Several generations before the
coming of the Europeans, Africa was neither a
“dark continent” nor the “hopeless” one that we know today. Historical evidence
shows that the continent was making commendable social, political and economic
achievements. But an accident of history changed all that. As Walter Rodney
asserts in his book How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Africa’s present
predicament “has been arrived at, not by the separate evolution of Africa on
the one hand and Europe on the other, but
exploitation.”
More than a thousand years ago some
African farmers practised advanced agriculture like terracing, crop rotation,
green manuring, mixed farming and swamp farming; wooden and stone implements
had given place to the axe and the hoe; Hausa and Mandingo experts dyed and
tanned a special type of leather called “red Moroccan leather” which Arabs in
North Africa bought and exported to Europe; cloth makers in the old kingdom of
the Congo made a cloth with a velvet-like finish from bark and palm fibre; even
far into the 19th century, Manchester cotton cloth, which was the
best in Europe, was no match for the ones Africans produced; in Katanga, Zambia
and Sierra Leone, African miners extracted copper and iron of a quality
superior to the European; guild masters in Timbuktu, the Malian town of
scholarship, initiated apprentices in tailoring skills whilst those in Benin
taught the working of brass and bronze and others in Nupe inculcated the making
of glass and bead; traders transported their goods for sale over several
enormous distances such as the Sahara Trade Route and the Katanga Copper
Routes; even State builders were making their début as Africa began to emerge
from communalism into feudalism. At this stage of African development, Europe however had already taken the lead. Nevertheless
the gap between the two continents was not too wide and even in some cases
European travellers attested that Africa did
better.
At this crucial period in the 15th
century, Europeans arrived on the African continent and established permanent
links with Africans. The centuries of relationship accelerated economic
development in Europe and stifled the
advancements that Africans had made as from the 10th century. This
was made possible with faster ships and powerful cannons which enabled
Europeans to control all the world’s waterways and turn African coastal areas
into economic satellites. Thus began the systematic transfer of wealth from
Africa to Europe with the help of a lopsided
international trade consisting largely of trade in human beings. Africa gave out treasures such as indigo, cam wood, gum,
ivory, gold and received in return both good and bad quality goods such as
cloth, beads, cheap gin, cheap gunpowder, Dutch linen, and cast-off uniforms.
But the worst came when Europeans discovered America and its gold, silver and
tropical produce. To tap this wealth required intensive labour. The American
Indians could not stand the stress. Europe could not afford to release its own
labour much needed in Europe itself. Africans
therefore became the ideal candidates and that led to the organized slave
trade.
If nothing at all, the Slave Trade
alone is enough to portray the injustice and the iniquity that generated
poverty in pre-colonial Africa, the
repercussions of which still exist today.
From 1445, millions of Africans were
hunted, captured, chained and shipped overseas to work free of charge for
Europeans. This labour enabled Europe to multiply her capital, sustain her
growth, and build up her shipping, insurance, companies, agriculture,
technology, manufacturing, sea-port towns, naval technology, and the colony of America.
But what happened in Africa?
The great societies and states like Egypt, Ethiopia, Nubia, the Maghreb, the
Western Sudan, the inter-lacustrine zone of East Africa and Zimbabwe which
could have blossomed further and suck other parts of Africa into their
developments began to decline. The Slave Trade massively took away the most
active population aged mainly between 15 and 35, the ablest arms which could
have built up the continent. If a growing population usually spurs
socio-economic expansion by supplying labour, markets and the pressures which
engender further advances, then a dwindling one will do only the exact
opposite. And this is what the Slave Trade did to us. In all the violence and
uncertainties bred by slave raiding, who could fish, farm, mine or trade? With
the depletion of the human resources of large areas of Africa,
where was the dynamism to fuel internal growth? Under such circumstances which
lasted for 425 long years, what could one reap but stark poverty?
As if that was not enough, hardly had Africans
recovered from the devastating effects of the Slave Trade when it ended in 1870
when Europeans forced them into colonialism, especially with the Scramble for
Africa at a conference table in Berlin
in 1884. Africa certainly gained something
from this enterprise, however if the balance sheet of colonialism is drawn, one
finds out that Africans became rather impoverished. African surpluses were not
kept and invested in the continent to help the economies grow. As for foreign
companies, Walter Rodney observed that they “were responsible for expatriating
a great proportion of Africa’s wealth produced
by peasant toil.” The European banks also made huge profits in Africa and sent
them as well as the reserves, to Europe. The
colonial State also aided to exploit and impoverish Africa.
Colonial administrations ran on taxes levied on Africans; they seized lands
from Africans to be exploited for farming and mining; they forced Africans to
produce cash crops whose prices were generally low; they instituted forced
labour for so-called “public works,” and African wealth, kept in the coffers of
metropolitan States, helped constitute reserves at the expense of the colonies.
Concerning socio-economic services like railroads,
schools, hospitals, means of communication and the like built by colonialism in
Africa, not only were they woefully inadequate but they were so planned and so
sited as to further exploit, oppress, disregard and impoverish Africa instead
of serving the direct interests of her citizens. Slowly the African got
marginalized in his own land. To really appreciate the destitution of Africans
during the colonial era, one must note that despite the mess Africans got
themselves embroiled in during the independence period, far more has been
achieved in practically all spheres in just 44 years (1960 to 2004) than
colonialism did in 76 years (1884 to 1960).
It was the iniquities of colonialism which made
independence hold aloft high promises of a new Africa
devoid of misery, but here too the results as at today are extremely
disappointing. What marred African hopes are of social, economic and political
order.
On the social front, the marginalisation of
women in all spheres of life except in procreation and in hard daily chores
cost Africa the contribution of around 52% of
its hard-working population. With the majority on the sidelines what notably
can the minority achieve? Worse, at the same time we did not help preserve the
environment. Our water bodies, forests, soil and air got heavily degraded. The
inevitable disaster therefore came in the form of natural calamities like
drought, polluted and drying rivers, depleting forests and game, loss of soil
fertility, the heated environment and the encroaching desert. These problems
were compounded by a population growth which constantly outdistanced our dismal
economic performance. The result could only be poverty.
Coming to politics, the exclusion of other
citizens from the affairs of the State, the institution of one-party Sates
which consolidated dictatorships led to coup d’états and attempted coup d’états
which occasioned political instability on the continent. Conflicts surfaced all
over and produced refugees and displaced persons. Hence governments became more
preoccupied with repressive security matters than with economic development and
the misery deepened. Worse still, the money loaned us for economic projects
were either mismanaged or simply siphoned off into foreign banks and our
external debts mounted. In addition to other internal factors which robbed Africa of wealth, non negligible external forces also
pauperized Africans. Notable is the one-sided international economic order. If
you trade with someone and he has the right to dictate the prices of the goods
you produce and sell him and you cannot do the same, and worse still if he
continually increases the prices of the goods he sells to you and at the same
time constantly reduces the prices of the goods he buys from you, one does not
need to understand anything at all about economics to know that sooner rather
than later bankruptcy will ensue. And naturally that is what has happened to Africa.
In the light of the above, how can prosperity
and dignity be achieved? Definitely this will be done by overcoming the injustice
and the inequality that caused the poverty in the first place. But how can this
be done? This laudable aim cannot be achieved in the immediate future by
fighting the iniquities in the international political and economic order. The
angle of least resistance and the methods which will produce results now should
first be adopted so that poor people in Africa
can soon access their basic rights and fulfil their basic needs and secure
sustained improvements in their livelihoods for further battles.
First of all people must be educated to change
their mentality. People who believe that they have neither the leadership nor
the human capacity to overcome the challenges facing them will not and cannot
succeed no matter the amount of resources and prodding given them. According to
an official International Correspondence Schools, ICS, Guide to Success in
Life, How to Open the Door to Your Future, five tools can help poor
people change their negative self image. These are visualization, affirmation,
education, association and action. Visualization is a sort of a positive
day-dreaming which will feed images to the inner mind to let needy people have
confidence in their abilities to accomplish goals that they set themselves.
Affirmation is the strengthening of visualization through self-talk. After
holding positive images of themselves, the poor should tell themselves that
they can also make it. Education is all about putting information at the
disposal of people so that they can do better whatever they set out to do. But
all four factors will not produce any results, except when action is taken. As
we know, action speaks louder than thoughts and words.
Once the mentalities change, the next step will
be to create the environment and conditions that will allow the social and
political will and confidence to grow and so enable the new capacity to be used
well.
How to Open the Door to Your Future says “There are three poverty
inducing habits at work in the lives of everybody stuck in poverty … breaking
these … habits is the first step up and out. These habits are negative attitude
about money, slavery to debt and not increasing one’s value in the marketplace.
The negative attitude about money among the
poor comes from the idea that they earn so little money that after paying for
essentials nothing can be left for savings. Yet without savings, a person will
forever remain in financial prison. The secret is to put aside a small
percentage of one’s monthly income, say even 1 to 5%, and resolve not to touch
it no matter what. Slavery to debt comes from buying on credit. The poor think
they have so little money that they must buy everything on credit and pay in
instalments. All this does is to maintain them in debt. The solution is to stop
buying on credit. According to the ICS book, one can increase one’s value in
the marketplace by 1. Performance, 2. Experience, 3. Education and 4.
Combination of 1, 2 and 3. On-the-job
performance can be improved “by having a better attitude, being more punctual,
cooperating better, cheerfully taking on extra tasks, whatever ... if, with
each passing month, you are learning a new skill, getting better at the job,
even finding ways to do things more effectively, then experience” will increase
one’s value. As for education, ICS contends that it “is the great INCOME
MULTIPLIER!” The world is changing fast and adaptation to this change requires
nothing but continuous education.
Just as some habits favour poverty, others on
the contrary ensure prosperity. According to ICS’s official guide, these are 1.
Saving, 2. Giving, and 3. Self-improvement.
Concerning saving, the ICS booklet advises:
“You may start just by putting ‘spare coins’ into a can at the end of every
day, and by putting a tiny 1% of every pay into a savings account”. This amount
may be small, but ICS contends that saving “has an impact on your self-image,
self-esteem and self-confidence” and “that habit becomes automatic behaviour.”
How to Open the Door to Your Future affirms that as mysterious and as
mystical as it may seem “the act of giving seems to increase wealth rather than
decrease it … when people continue the habit of SAVING with the habit of
GIVING, they seem to ‘attract’ new job opportunities, promotions, raises, even
money coming to them from unusual and unexpected sources.” One may regularly
and constantly give one’s time and a small donation to charitable organizations
and community improvement projects.
Self-improvement as a poverty-banishing
strategy can be done through formal or informal education. Classroom courses,
seminars and reading are wise investments of time and money that could enhance
the human asset among the poor and the marginalized.
The first condition to wealth on the national
scale is democracy and good governance. When people freely choose their
leaders, they identify with them and therefore less social tension exists. The
prevailing peace aids development. Besides, conscious that they owe their
position to the electorate, politicians will institute policies which will
further the common good and ensure their re-election. Good governance on the
other hand will ensure the optimum use of all resources. The subsequent
elimination of waste can only benefit everybody, especially the poor.
But democracy and good governance will be
illusions if the huge external debt still hangs over us. Each year huge amounts
of money, sometimes up to 25% of the national budget, are used to service this
debt. Imagine what these amounts could do in the fight against poverty! A
vigorous campaign should be mounted to have Africa’s
debts cancelled.
One area which can help Africa
fulfil its potential is the provision of health facilities. Coupled with
education, health facilities will give us healthy minds in healthy bodies. Lack
of sufficient health care facilities may favour diseases. Diseases in turn may
lead to loss of productivity which has direct consequence on the incomes of
African households. Diseases do cause death. Death robs households of those who
earn incomes. Making health facilities available will therefore lead to the reduction
of poverty of African households.
Another factor which will reduce poverty in Africa, especially in the rural areas, is the provision
of utilities and basic infrastructure such as water, electricity,
telecommunication facilities, roads, schools and recreational facilities, among
others. Pipe-borne water will reduce the incidence of water-borne diseases
which diminishes people’s ability to be productive; electricity will give the
poor and the marginalized in rural and remote areas the opportunity to go into
small scale income-generating activities such as corn-milling and primary
processing of agricultural products not only to reduce wastage due to
post-harvest losses but also to add value to the products; information
technology is sweeping the whole world and no nook and cranny in Africa can
afford not to be part of the globalize village; telephone, fax, computers and
internet facilities will help the poor to tap into the benefits of this new
technology to lift them out of misery; the poor often live in inaccessible
areas, yet they have to cart their
produce to marketing centres, hence the need for roads; the poor are often
illiterate: schools to be built for them will serve both their children for
formal education and themselves for functional literacy programmes; as for
recreational facilities they will help avoid the “all work and no play makes
Jack a dull boy” syndrome. And everybody knows that no dull person can work
hard.
Agriculture maybe holds the best key to locking
out poverty in Africa. With the help of
irrigation dams, people could produce food year-round to feed themselves and
also sell the surplus on the local market for income or export it for foreign
exchange. Since agriculture weighs heavily on the rate of inflation which could
reduce the purchasing power of the poor, it is simply common sense for the poor
to invest in it. But not much will be achieved in this regard as well as in
others for the poor if they lack the requisite training which will enable them
use their limited resources well, if credit facilities, especially those
specifically designed for the poor, are not extended to them and if they are
not granted tax relief to allow them to build up capital.
Tourism is another high yielding activity in
which the poor and the marginalized have a role to play to create wealth for
themselves. Sustainable tourism, as an export commodity, does not deplete its
resources neither does it degrade the environment. Tourism permeates the entire
economy. It requires among others, transportation, accommodation, catering,
entertainment, souvenirs, tour guides and visits to exotic places. These
services could be provided by big and small investors in both urban and rural
areas and among simple and sophisticated workers. And since the World Tourism
Organization, WTO, forecasts a favourable long-term growth in tourism in Africa, it only makes sense to invest in it for the poor
to reap its benefits.
All said and done, there are only very few
human activities nowadays that do not require technology. Technology provides
solutions to problems faced by today’s farmers, carpenters, mechanics,
shoemakers, masons, electricians and others. For technology to be appropriate
for the poor, organizations working with them should liaise with the
universities, the polytechnics and research institutes to design simple
technological equipments which would not only ease the burden of the poor but
also help them work more efficiently and thus cut costs. The end result can
only be more wealth.
But all the noble ideas outlined above to help
banish poverty in Africa could come to nought
if attention is not paid to marginalization of women and bribery and
corruption. Gender equality will transform women’s lives, those of their
families and indeed of the entire society. These gains will translate into
better life for all. Yet prosperity for all could also be an illusion if
strategies are not devised to fight corruption in Africa.
As the British Minister of State in
charge of Africa, Peter Hain, observed: “… corrupt, selfish regimes have
blocked their people from finding their way out of poverty … Honest governments
working for the benefit of their people could have brought great prosperity to
that continent.”
From all that precedes, we see that the causes
of poverty in Africa are of both external and
internal origin. But we believe that since the external factors are not easy to
overcome and in the immediate, Africans should first concentrate on lifting the
stumbling blocks they themselves created and which keep them poor. Through such
measures, the poor and the marginalized can eradicate much of the poverty that
haunts them. It is only when this happens that Africans on the one hand will
harness more strength and the necessary resources to fight for their rights;
and foreigners on the other will also have no choice but to do away with the
injustice and the inequality that perpetuate poverty in Africa.
(Written
15th July 2000)
No comments:
Post a Comment